PairBook
HomeED › ED vs EMR

ED vs EMR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emerson Electric (EMR) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.01
long-run
Ann. covariance
-81.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ED and EMR?

On 3 years of weekly data the ED/EMR correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.30 versus -0.17 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.01, and annualized covariance runs at -81.0 %².

Within ED's tracked universe of 105 assets, EMR comes in at #29 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months EMR came out ahead by 9.8 percentage points (+10.2% against +20.0%). On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between -0.39 and 0.08, a moderate band. Note the risk asymmetry: EMR runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ED vs EMR: side by side

ED (Consolidated Edison)EMR (Emerson Electric)
1-year return+10.2%+20.0%
5-year return+67.5%+65.4%
Volatility (ann.)16.5%28.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.211.29
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.4%-29.6%
Market cap$39.5B$88.0B
P/E (trailing)17.534.5
Dividend yield3.22%1.39%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesIndustrials
Lower P/E: ED 17.5 vs 34.5Higher yield: ED 3.22% vs 1.39%Smaller drawdown: ED -17.4% vs -29.6%Higher 5y return: ED +67.5% vs +65.4%
-5%0%+25%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ED · EMR

Year-by-year returns

YearEDEMR
2022+15.7%+5.7%
2023-1.1%+3.8%
2024+1.5%+29.7%
2025+15.1%+8.9%
2026+10.1%+20.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ED and EMR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ED and EMR?

The ED/EMR correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.30, 5 years: 0.01), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is EMR a good diversifier for ED?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ed-vs-emr.json

ED vs EMR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17ED vs EMR-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ED vs EMR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ed-vs-emr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ed-vs-emr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ED correlations · EMR correlations