PairBook
HomeECO › ECO vs TLT

ECO vs TLT: Correlation

How closely do Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-152.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ECO and TLT?

Over the past 3 years, ECO and TLT moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.09) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -152.0 %².

TLT is close to the least connected end of ECO's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: ECO led by 189.5 percentage points, +189.8% for ECO against +0.3% for TLT. Note the risk asymmetry: ECO runs 3.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ECO vs TLT: side by side

ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.)TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF)
1-year return+189.8%+0.3%
5-year returnn/a-34.0%
Volatility (ann.)44.3%13.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.520.11
Max drawdown (3Y)-46.1%-14.8%
Market cap$2.6B
P/E (trailing)5.8
Dividend yield0.00%4.75%
Expense ratio0.15%
Assets under management$41.5B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Bonds
Higher yield: TLT 4.75% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TLT -14.8% vs -46.1%

On the fund side, TLT sits in the Long Government category at iShares, with $41.5B under management, a 0.15% expense ratio, a 4.75% trailing dividend yield.

-4%0%+174%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ECO · TLT

Year-by-year returns

YearECOTLT
2022-31.2%
2023+2.8%
2024-11.7%-8.1%
2025+64.2%+4.2%
2026+128.8%-2.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ECO and TLT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ECO and TLT?

The ECO/TLT correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.09, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TLT a good diversifier for ECO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/eco-vs-tlt.json

ECO vs TLT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25ECO vs TLT-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ECO vs TLT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/eco-vs-tlt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/eco-vs-tlt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ECO correlations · TLT correlations