PairBook
HomeECHO › ECHO vs PHI

ECHO vs PHI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, EchoStar (ECHO) and PLDT Inc. Sponsored ADR (PHI) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-384.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ECHO and PHI?

On 3 years of weekly data the ECHO/PHI correlation comes out at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.09) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.09, and annualized covariance runs at -384.3 %².

PHI is close to the least connected end of ECHO's tracked universe, ranking #31 of 35. The last year tells two different stories: ECHO led by 55.4 percentage points, +47.2% for ECHO against -8.2% for PHI. Note the risk asymmetry: ECHO runs 3.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ECHO vs PHI: side by side

ECHO (EchoStar)PHI (PLDT Inc. Sponsored ADR)
1-year return+47.2%-8.2%
5-year return+227.3%-17.6%
Volatility (ann.)91.1%24.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.170.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-50.1%-33.7%
Market cap$25.1B
P/E (trailing)9.4
Dividend yield0.00%494.13%
Sector / categoryCommunication ServicesUS Listed
Higher yield: PHI 494.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PHI -33.7% vs -50.1%Higher 5y return: ECHO +227.3% vs -17.6%
-7%0%+104%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ECHO · PHI

Year-by-year returns

YearECHOPHI
2022-36.7%-31.7%
2023-0.7%+11.9%
2024+38.2%+0.8%
2025+374.7%+1.5%
2026-20.5%-14.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ECHO and PHI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ECHO and PHI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ECHO and PHI is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.09 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is PHI a good diversifier for ECHO?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/echo-vs-phi.json

ECHO vs PHI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18ECHO vs PHI-0.18

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ECHO vs PHI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/echo-vs-phi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/echo-vs-phi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ECHO correlations · PHI correlations