PairBook
HomeDXYZ › DXYZ vs MQ

DXYZ vs MQ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Destiny Tech100 Inc. (DXYZ) and Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) carry a correlation of -0.33, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.05
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2982.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DXYZ and MQ?

On 3 years of weekly data the DXYZ/MQ correlation comes out at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.05) than the 3-year average (-0.33). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -2982.5 %².

Out of 32 assets tracked against DXYZ, MQ lands near the bottom at #32. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months DXYZ outperformed by 60.3 percentage points (+24.9% for DXYZ against -35.4% for MQ). Risk is not evenly split, since DXYZ carries 4.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DXYZ vs MQ: side by side

DXYZ (Destiny Tech100 Inc.)MQ (Marqeta, Inc.)
1-year return+24.9%-35.4%
5-year returnn/a-85.0%
Volatility (ann.)201.3%43.5%
Beta vs S&P 5003.940.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-90.3%-53.3%
Market cap$1.1B$1.7B
P/E (trailing)9.8180.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: DXYZ 9.8 vs 180.1Smaller drawdown: MQ -53.3% vs -90.3%
-38%0%+158%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DXYZ · MQ

Year-by-year returns

YearDXYZMQ
2022-64.4%
2023+14.2%
2024-45.7%
2025-48.0%+25.3%
2026+15.6%-14.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DXYZ and MQ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DXYZ and MQ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DXYZ and MQ is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.05 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MQ a good diversifier for DXYZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dxyz-vs-mq.json

DXYZ vs MQ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33DXYZ vs MQ-0.33

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DXYZ vs MQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dxyz-vs-mq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dxyz-vs-mq/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DXYZ correlations · MQ correlations