PairBook
HomeDUK › DUK vs MCHP

DUK vs MCHP: Correlation

Duke Energy (DUK) and Microchip Technology (MCHP) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-143.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DUK and MCHP?

On 3 years of weekly data the DUK/MCHP correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.31) than the 3-year average (-0.19). The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -143.4 %².

Among the 53 assets we track against DUK, MCHP ranks #31 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MCHP led by 15.1 percentage points, +1.1% for DUK against +16.2% for MCHP. Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from -0.43 to 0.14. Note the risk asymmetry: MCHP runs 2.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DUK vs MCHP: side by side

DUK (Duke Energy)MCHP (Microchip Technology)
1-year return+1.1%+16.2%
5-year return+39.8%+5.9%
Volatility (ann.)15.9%46.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.091.97
Max drawdown (3Y)-11.6%-63.8%
Market cap$94.2B$41.0B
P/E (trailing)18.3109.4
Dividend yield3.49%2.46%
Sector / categoryUtilitiesInformation Technology
Lower P/E: DUK 18.3 vs 109.4Higher yield: DUK 3.49% vs 2.46%Smaller drawdown: DUK -11.6% vs -63.8%Higher 5y return: DUK +39.8% vs +5.9%
-23%0%+54%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DUK · MCHP

Year-by-year returns

YearDUKMCHP
2022+2.0%-18.0%
2023-1.6%+30.9%
2024+15.6%-35.0%
2025+12.7%+14.6%
2026+5.8%+20.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DUK and MCHP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DUK and MCHP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DUK and MCHP is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.31 over 1 year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is MCHP a good diversifier for DUK?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/duk-vs-mchp.json

DUK vs MCHP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19DUK vs MCHP-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DUK vs MCHP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/duk-vs-mchp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/duk-vs-mchp/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DUK correlations · MCHP correlations