PairBook
HomeDT › DT vs ZS

DT vs ZS: Correlation

How closely do Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) and Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.57
long-run
Ann. covariance
889.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DT and ZS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DT and ZS correlate at 0.57, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.65 over 1 year against 0.57 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.57, with an annualized covariance of 889.8 %².

Among the 26 assets we track against DT, ZS ranks #11 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: DT led by 38.0 percentage points, +6.6% for DT against -31.4% for ZS.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DT vs ZS: side by side

DT (Dynatrace, Inc.)ZS (Zscaler, Inc.)
1-year return+6.6%-31.4%
5-year return-21.5%-32.7%
Volatility (ann.)34.3%45.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.021.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.2%-64.9%
Market cap$15.5B$30.3B
P/E (trailing)102.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: DT -48.2% vs -64.9%Higher 5y return: DT -21.5% vs -32.7%
-57%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. DT · ZS

Year-by-year returns

YearDTZS
2022-36.5%-65.2%
2023+42.8%+98.0%
2024-0.6%-18.6%
2025-20.3%+24.7%
2026+23.3%-16.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DT and ZS good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DT and ZS?

The DT/ZS correlation stands at 0.57 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.65, 5 years: 0.57), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZS a good diversifier for DT?

To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.57 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dt-vs-zs.json

DT vs ZS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57DT vs ZS0.57

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DT vs ZS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dt-vs-zs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dt-vs-zs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DT correlations · ZS correlations