PairBook
HomeDSM › DSM vs MHF

DSM vs MHF: Correlation

How closely do BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. (DSM) and Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund, Inc. (MHF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.56, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.56
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.61
long-run
Ann. covariance
84.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DSM and MHF?

Over the past 3 years, DSM and MHF moved with a correlation of 0.56, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (0.56). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.61, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 84.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, MHF places #13 of the 18 assets tracked against DSM. Their 12-month results are close: +8.6% for DSM against +5.6% for MHF.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DSM vs MHF: side by side

DSM (BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund, Inc.)MHF (Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund, Inc.)
1-year return+8.6%+5.6%
5-year return-13.5%+6.2%
Volatility (ann.)12.4%12.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.290.32
Max drawdown (3Y)-13.4%-13.3%
Market cap$0.3B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)9.218.0
Dividend yield4.94%5.93%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: DSM 9.2 vs 18.0Higher yield: MHF 5.93% vs 4.94%Smaller drawdown: MHF -13.3% vs -13.4%Higher 5y return: MHF +6.2% vs -13.5%
-6%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DSM · MHF

Year-by-year returns

YearDSMMHF
2022-27.0%-17.6%
2023+3.2%+4.6%
2024+5.5%+12.0%
2025+10.9%+7.2%
2026-2.4%+3.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DSM and MHF good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.56 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DSM and MHF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.56 over 3 years, with 0.46 over the last year and 0.61 over 5 years.

Is MHF a good diversifier for DSM?

To a limited degree. At 0.56 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.56 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.56 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dsm-vs-mhf.json

DSM vs MHF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.56DSM vs MHF0.56

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DSM vs MHF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dsm-vs-mhf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dsm-vs-mhf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DSM correlations · MHF correlations