PairBook
HomeDRIO › DRIO vs LAC

DRIO vs LAC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, DarioHealth Corp. (DRIO) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.76
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
4815.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DRIO and LAC?

On 3 years of weekly data the DRIO/LAC correlation comes out at 0.48, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.76) than the 3-year average (0.48). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 4815.2 %².

Few assets follow DRIO as closely as LAC, which ranks #3 of 13 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: LAC led by 36.0 percentage points, -29.6% for DRIO against +6.4% for LAC.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DRIO vs LAC: side by side

DRIO (DarioHealth Corp.)LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.)
1-year return-29.6%+6.4%
5-year return-97.3%n/a
Volatility (ann.)106.1%93.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.921.37
Max drawdown (3Y)-91.2%-81.8%
Market cap$0.1B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: LAC -81.8% vs -91.2%
-31%0%+213%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DRIO · LAC

Year-by-year returns

YearDRIOLAC
2022-67.0%
2023-59.8%
2024-54.3%-53.6%
2025-27.6%+46.8%
2026-40.5%-27.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DRIO and LAC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DRIO and LAC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DRIO and LAC is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.76 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is LAC a good diversifier for DRIO?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

A reading of 0.48 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/drio-vs-lac.json

DRIO vs LAC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48DRIO vs LAC0.48

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DRIO vs LAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/drio-vs-lac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/drio-vs-lac/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DRIO correlations · LAC correlations