DPZ vs ROST: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Domino's (DPZ) and Ross Stores (ROST) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DPZ and ROST?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DPZ and ROST correlate at 0.37, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.46 over 1 year against 0.37 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.37, with an annualized covariance of 248.7 %².
Within DPZ's tracked universe of 31 assets, ROST comes in at #18 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ROST outperformed by 79.5 percentage points (-25.2% for DPZ against +54.3% for ROST). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.21 to 0.48.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DPZ vs ROST: side by side
| DPZ (Domino's) | ROST (Ross Stores) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -25.2% | +54.3% |
| 5-year return | -31.2% | +105.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.8% | 24.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.67 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -45.1% | -21.1% |
| Market cap | $11.0B | $73.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 19.5 | 27.8 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 0.72% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DPZ | ROST |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -37.9% | +2.9% |
| 2023 | +20.7% | +20.6% |
| 2024 | +3.2% | +10.4% |
| 2025 | +0.9% | +20.4% |
| 2026 | -19.4% | +28.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DPZ and ROST good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.37, DPZ and ROST keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DPZ and ROST?
The DPZ/ROST correlation stands at 0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.46, 5 years: 0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is ROST a good diversifier for DPZ?
Reasonably. At 0.37, DPZ and ROST keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.37 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dpz-vs-rost.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dpz-vs-rost/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DPZ correlations · ROST correlations
