DPZ vs RL: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Domino's (DPZ) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) carry a correlation of 0.40, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DPZ and RL?
On 3 years of weekly data the DPZ/RL correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.31) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.39, and annualized covariance runs at 368.9 %².
Among the 31 assets we track against DPZ, RL ranks #13 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RL outperformed by 45.9 percentage points (-25.2% for DPZ against +20.7% for RL). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.27 to 0.55.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DPZ vs RL: side by side
| DPZ (Domino's) | RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -25.2% | +20.7% |
| 5-year return | -31.2% | +232.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.8% | 33.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.67 | 1.07 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -45.1% | -36.2% |
| Market cap | $11.0B | $21.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 19.5 | 22.8 |
| Dividend yield | 2.17% | 1.03% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DPZ | RL |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -37.9% | -8.4% |
| 2023 | +20.7% | +39.8% |
| 2024 | +3.2% | +62.9% |
| 2025 | +0.9% | +55.0% |
| 2026 | -19.4% | +0.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DPZ and RL good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DPZ and RL?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.40 over 3 years, with 0.31 over the last year and 0.39 over 5 years.
Is RL a good diversifier for DPZ?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.40 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dpz-vs-rl.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dpz-vs-rl/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DPZ correlations · RL correlations
