PairBook
HomeDLTH › DLTH vs M

DLTH vs M: Correlation

How closely do Duluth Holdings Inc. (DLTH) and Macy's Inc (M) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.66
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
1472.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DLTH and M?

Over the past 3 years, DLTH and M moved with a correlation of 0.43, which is moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.66 versus 0.43 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.43, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1472.7 %².

Few assets follow DLTH as closely as M, which ranks #3 of 11 tracked partners. The trailing year gives M the advantage: +62.3% versus +71.8%, a 9.5-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DLTH vs M: side by side

DLTH (Duluth Holdings Inc.)M (Macy's Inc)
1-year return+62.3%+71.8%
5-year return-76.9%+21.5%
Volatility (ann.)69.4%49.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.641.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-77.4%-51.3%
Market cap$0.1B$5.9B
P/E (trailing)9.4
Dividend yield0.00%3.24%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: M 3.24% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: M -51.3% vs -77.4%Higher 5y return: M +21.5% vs -76.9%
-45%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DLTH · M

Year-by-year returns

YearDLTHM
2022-59.3%-18.7%
2023-12.9%+1.6%
2024-42.6%-12.4%
2025-32.7%+36.5%
2026+77.9%+4.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DLTH and M good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.43, DLTH and M keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DLTH and M?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.43 over 3 years, with 0.66 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.

Is M a good diversifier for DLTH?

Reasonably. At 0.43, DLTH and M keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

A reading of 0.43 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dlth-vs-m.json

DLTH vs M: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43DLTH vs M0.43

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DLTH vs M correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dlth-vs-m.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dlth-vs-m/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DLTH correlations · M correlations