DIBS vs MUSA: Correlation
How closely do 1stdibs.com, Inc. (DIBS) and Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are DIBS and MUSA?
Over the past 3 years, DIBS and MUSA moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.26) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.08, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -305.5 %².
Among the 11 assets we track against DIBS, MUSA sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with DIBS ahead by 24.6 points (+59.9% versus +35.3%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
DIBS vs MUSA: side by side
| DIBS (1stdibs.com, Inc.) | MUSA (Murphy USA Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +59.9% | +35.3% |
| 5-year return | -74.0% | +234.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.7% | 33.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.59 | 0.06 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -61.3% | -35.5% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $9.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 16.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.46% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | DIBS | MUSA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -59.4% | +41.0% |
| 2023 | -7.9% | +28.2% |
| 2024 | -24.4% | +41.3% |
| 2025 | +69.2% | -19.1% |
| 2026 | -27.4% | +26.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are DIBS and MUSA good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between DIBS and MUSA?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DIBS and MUSA is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.26 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.
Is MUSA a good diversifier for DIBS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dibs-vs-musa.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dibs-vs-musa/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: DIBS correlations · MUSA correlations
