PairBook
HomeDHF › DHF vs POLA

DHF vs POLA: Correlation

How closely do BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF) and Polar Power, Inc. (POLA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.37
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
327.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DHF and POLA?

On 3 years of weekly data the DHF/POLA correlation comes out at 0.37, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.31 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.29, and annualized covariance runs at 327.6 %².

Within DHF's tracked universe of 15 assets, POLA comes in at #10 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: DHF led by 29.8 percentage points, -0.6% for DHF against -30.4% for POLA. One caveat on sizing: POLA is 6.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DHF vs POLA: side by side

DHF (BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund)POLA (Polar Power, Inc.)
1-year return-0.6%-30.4%
5-year return+7.9%-97.1%
Volatility (ann.)11.4%77.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.521.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-11.8%-87.6%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)13.8
Dividend yield8.90%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: DHF 8.90% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: DHF -11.8% vs -87.6%Higher 5y return: DHF +7.9% vs -97.1%
-46%0%+71%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DHF · POLA

Year-by-year returns

YearDHFPOLA
2022-22.5%-64.0%
2023+15.0%-68.2%
2024+21.4%+11.5%
2025+5.9%-47.8%
2026-0.2%-13.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DHF and POLA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DHF and POLA?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.37 over 3 years, with 0.31 over the last year and 0.29 over 5 years.

Is POLA a good diversifier for DHF?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?

A reading of 0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dhf-vs-pola.json

DHF vs POLA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.37DHF vs POLA0.37

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DHF vs POLA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dhf-vs-pola.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dhf-vs-pola/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DHF correlations · POLA correlations