PairBook
HomeDGZ › DGZ vs THM

DGZ vs THM: Correlation

DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DGZ) and International Tower Hill Mines, Ltd. (THM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.34.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
-869.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DGZ and THM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DGZ and THM correlate at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.27 over 1 year against -0.34 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.37, with an annualized covariance of -869.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, THM places #129 of the 156 assets tracked against DGZ. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months THM outperformed by 127.3 percentage points (-26.6% for DGZ against +100.7% for THM). Risk is not evenly split, since THM carries 3.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DGZ vs THM: side by side

DGZ (DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038)THM (International Tower Hill Mines, Ltd.)
1-year return-26.6%+100.7%
5-year return-50.3%+222.1%
Volatility (ann.)28.3%89.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.181.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.5%-51.5%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: THM -51.5% vs -59.5%Higher 5y return: THM +222.1% vs -50.3%
-28%0%+149%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DGZ · THM

Year-by-year returns

YearDGZTHM
2022+4.9%-41.1%
2023-4.7%+37.2%
2024-16.5%-22.0%
2025-32.5%+304.3%
2026-10.0%+48.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DGZ and THM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DGZ and THM?

The DGZ/THM correlation stands at -0.34 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.27, 5 years: -0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is THM a good diversifier for DGZ?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dgz-vs-thm.json

DGZ vs THM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34DGZ vs THM-0.34

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DGZ vs THM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dgz-vs-thm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dgz-vs-thm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DGZ correlations · THM correlations