PairBook
HomeDGZ › DGZ vs SCZM

DGZ vs SCZM: Correlation

DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DGZ) and Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
-814.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DGZ and SCZM?

On 3 years of weekly data the DGZ/SCZM correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.34 over 1 year against -0.30 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.33, and annualized covariance runs at -814.1 %².

Within DGZ's tracked universe of 156 assets, SCZM comes in at #112 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SCZM outperformed by 135.4 percentage points (-26.6% for DGZ against +108.8% for SCZM). Note the risk asymmetry: SCZM runs 3.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DGZ vs SCZM: side by side

DGZ (DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038)SCZM (Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.)
1-year return-26.6%+108.8%
5-year return-50.3%+818.6%
Volatility (ann.)28.3%96.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.181.72
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.5%-63.2%
Market cap$0.9B
P/E (trailing)21.3
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: DGZ -59.5% vs -63.2%Higher 5y return: SCZM +818.6% vs -50.3%
-28%0%+180%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DGZ · SCZM

Year-by-year returns

YearDGZSCZM
2022+4.9%+25.0%
2023-4.7%-38.3%
2024-16.5%+5.5%
2025-32.5%+1137.2%
2026-10.0%+3.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DGZ and SCZM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DGZ and SCZM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DGZ and SCZM is -0.30 over 3 years, -0.34 over 1 year and -0.33 over 5 years.

Is SCZM a good diversifier for DGZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

A reading of -0.30 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dgz-vs-sczm.json

DGZ vs SCZM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30DGZ vs SCZM-0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DGZ vs SCZM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dgz-vs-sczm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dgz-vs-sczm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DGZ correlations · SCZM correlations