PairBook
HomeDGZ › DGZ vs MTVA

DGZ vs MTVA: Correlation

How closely do DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DGZ) and MetaVia Inc. (MTVA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.28, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1353.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DGZ and MTVA?

On 3 years of weekly data the DGZ/MTVA correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.32 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.16, and annualized covariance runs at -1353.3 %².

Within DGZ's tracked universe of 156 assets, MTVA comes in at #103 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months DGZ outperformed by 49.6 percentage points (-26.6% for DGZ against -76.2% for MTVA). Risk is not evenly split, since MTVA carries 6.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DGZ vs MTVA: side by side

DGZ (DB Gold Short ETN due February 15, 2038)MTVA (MetaVia Inc.)
1-year return-26.6%-76.2%
5-year return-50.3%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)28.3%173.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.181.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.5%-98.6%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: DGZ -59.5% vs -98.6%Higher 5y return: DGZ -50.3% vs -100.0%
-86%0%+51%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DGZ · MTVA

Year-by-year returns

YearDGZMTVA
2022+4.9%-98.0%
2023-4.7%-35.6%
2024-16.5%-45.1%
2025-32.5%-62.3%
2026-10.0%-80.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DGZ and MTVA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DGZ and MTVA?

The DGZ/MTVA correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: -0.16), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MTVA a good diversifier for DGZ?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dgz-vs-mtva.json

DGZ vs MTVA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28DGZ vs MTVA-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DGZ vs MTVA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dgz-vs-mtva.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dgz-vs-mtva/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DGZ correlations · MTVA correlations