PairBook
HomeDG › DG vs SCZM

DG vs SCZM: Correlation

How closely do Dollar General (DG) and Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.32, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.32
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
1170.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DG and SCZM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DG and SCZM correlate at 0.32, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.31) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.17, with an annualized covariance of 1170.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, SCZM places #8 of the 32 assets tracked against DG. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SCZM ahead by 93.3 points (+15.5% versus +108.8%). One caveat on sizing: SCZM is 2.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DG vs SCZM: side by side

DG (Dollar General)SCZM (Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd.)
1-year return+15.5%+108.8%
5-year return-39.3%+818.6%
Volatility (ann.)38.5%96.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.111.72
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.6%-63.2%
Market cap$27.8B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)17.421.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Lower P/E: DG 17.4 vs 21.3Smaller drawdown: DG -56.6% vs -63.2%Higher 5y return: SCZM +818.6% vs -39.3%
-9%0%+180%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DG · SCZM

Year-by-year returns

YearDGSCZM
2022+5.6%+25.0%
2023-44.1%-38.3%
2024-43.1%+5.5%
2025+79.6%+1137.2%
2026-3.8%+3.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DG and SCZM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DG and SCZM?

The DG/SCZM correlation stands at 0.32 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.31, 5 years: 0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SCZM a good diversifier for DG?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.32 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dg-vs-sczm.json

DG vs SCZM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.32DG vs SCZM0.32

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DG vs SCZM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dg-vs-sczm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dg-vs-sczm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DG correlations · SCZM correlations