PairBook
HomeDFSC › DFSC vs YUM

DFSC vs YUM: Correlation

DEFSEC Technologies Inc. (DFSC) and Yum! Brands (YUM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-713.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DFSC and YUM?

Over the past 3 years, DFSC and YUM moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.33) than the 3-year average (-0.22). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.06, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -713.4 %².

Among the 14 assets we track against DFSC, YUM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months YUM outperformed by 49.8 percentage points (-44.1% for DFSC against +5.7% for YUM). Risk is not evenly split, since DFSC carries 7.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DFSC vs YUM: side by side

DFSC (DEFSEC Technologies Inc.)YUM (Yum! Brands)
1-year return-44.1%+5.7%
5-year return-100.0%+26.2%
Volatility (ann.)152.6%21.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.900.34
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-14.5%
Market cap$41.1B
P/E (trailing)19.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: YUM 0.95% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: YUM -14.5% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: YUM +26.2% vs -100.0%
-58%0%+74%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. DFSC · YUM

Year-by-year returns

YearDFSCYUM
2022-96.2%-6.0%
2023-65.1%+3.9%
2024-92.2%+4.7%
2025-88.4%+14.9%
2026+9.4%+0.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DFSC and YUM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, DFSC and YUM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DFSC and YUM?

The DFSC/YUM correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: 0.06), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is YUM a good diversifier for DFSC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, DFSC and YUM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dfsc-vs-yum.json

DFSC vs YUM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22DFSC vs YUM-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DFSC vs YUM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dfsc-vs-yum.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dfsc-vs-yum/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DFSC correlations · YUM correlations