PairBook
HomeDFNS › DFNS vs GUG

DFNS vs GUG: Correlation

How closely do T3 Defense Inc. (DFNS) and Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-23652.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DFNS and GUG?

Over the past 3 years, DFNS and GUG moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.30). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.18, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -23652.1 %².

Within DFNS's tracked universe of 44 assets, GUG comes in at #38 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with DFNS ahead by 188.1 points (+193.5% versus +5.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since DFNS carries 475.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DFNS vs GUG: side by side

DFNS (T3 Defense Inc.)GUG (Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund)
1-year return+193.5%+5.4%
5-year return-77.9%+16.3%
Volatility (ann.)6136.1%12.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-23.330.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.9%-12.1%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)9.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GUG -12.1% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: GUG +16.3% vs -77.9%
-99%0%+694%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DFNS · GUG

Year-by-year returns

YearDFNSGUG
2022+5.0%-26.5%
2023-62.5%+20.7%
2024+59.9%+11.5%
2025-89.0%+13.1%
2026+215.4%+4.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DFNS and GUG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DFNS and GUG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with -0.46 over the last year and -0.18 over 5 years.

Is GUG a good diversifier for DFNS?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dfns-vs-gug.json

DFNS vs GUG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30DFNS vs GUG-0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DFNS vs GUG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dfns-vs-gug.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dfns-vs-gug/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DFNS correlations · GUG correlations