PairBook
HomeDFDV › DFDV vs MFM

DFDV vs MFM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, DeFi Development Corp. (DFDV) and Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund (MFM) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2382.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DFDV and MFM?

On 3 years of weekly data the DFDV/MFM correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.23) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.27). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -2382.7 %².

Among the 60 assets we track against DFDV, MFM ranks #28 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MFM outperformed by 76.6 percentage points (-65.4% for DFDV against +11.2% for MFM). Risk is not evenly split, since DFDV carries 54.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DFDV vs MFM: side by side

DFDV (DeFi Development Corp.)MFM (Aberdeen Municipal Income Fund)
1-year return-65.4%+11.2%
5-year returnn/a-4.9%
Volatility (ann.)693.3%12.8%
Beta vs S&P 50012.240.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.2%-11.7%
Market cap$0.2B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)13.1
Dividend yield0.00%5.25%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MFM 5.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MFM -11.7% vs -94.2%
-83%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DFDV · MFM

Year-by-year returns

YearDFDVMFM
2022-22.6%
2023+4.2%
2024-41.1%+8.5%
2025+628.1%+7.0%
2026+4.6%+3.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DFDV and MFM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, DFDV and MFM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DFDV and MFM?

The DFDV/MFM correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.23, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MFM a good diversifier for DFDV?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, DFDV and MFM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

A reading of -0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dfdv-vs-mfm.json

DFDV vs MFM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27DFDV vs MFM-0.27

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![DFDV vs MFM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dfdv-vs-mfm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dfdv-vs-mfm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DFDV correlations · MFM correlations