PairBook
HomeDECK › DECK vs FNGD

DECK vs FNGD: Correlation

How closely do Deckers Brands (DECK) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.32, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1057.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DECK and FNGD?

On 3 years of weekly data the DECK/FNGD correlation comes out at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.20 versus -0.32 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.36, and annualized covariance runs at -1057.6 %².

Among the 31 assets we track against DECK, FNGD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #29. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months DECK outperformed by 29.7 percentage points (-26.0% for DECK against -55.7% for FNGD). Note the risk asymmetry: FNGD runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DECK vs FNGD: side by side

DECK (Deckers Brands)FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)
1-year return-26.0%-55.7%
5-year return+22.8%-99.4%
Volatility (ann.)43.6%75.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.20-4.54
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.3%-97.6%
Market cap$11.8B
P/E (trailing)12.720.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Lower P/E: DECK 12.7 vs 20.6Smaller drawdown: DECK -64.3% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: DECK +22.8% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DECK · FNGD

Year-by-year returns

YearDECKFNGD
2022+9.0%+52.2%
2023+67.5%-90.1%
2024+82.3%-76.6%
2025-49.0%-61.4%
2026-16.7%-49.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DECK and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DECK and FNGD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DECK and FNGD is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.20 over 1 year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is FNGD a good diversifier for DECK?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/deck-vs-fngd.json

DECK vs FNGD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32DECK vs FNGD-0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DECK vs FNGD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/deck-vs-fngd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/deck-vs-fngd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DECK correlations · FNGD correlations