PairBook
HomeDDD › DDD vs FNGD

DDD vs FNGD: Correlation

How closely do 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2312.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DDD and FNGD?

On 3 years of weekly data the DDD/FNGD correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.49 versus -0.35 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.45, and annualized covariance runs at -2312.1 %².

FNGD is close to the least connected end of DDD's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months DDD outperformed by 89.7 percentage points (+34.0% for DDD against -55.7% for FNGD).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DDD vs FNGD: side by side

DDD (3D Systems Corporation)FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)
1-year return+34.0%-55.7%
5-year return-88.6%-99.4%
Volatility (ann.)88.0%75.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.29-4.54
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.8%-97.6%
Market cap$0.6B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: DDD -79.8% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: DDD -88.6% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+75%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). DDD · FNGD

Year-by-year returns

YearDDDFNGD
2022-65.6%+52.2%
2023-14.2%-90.1%
2024-48.3%-76.6%
2025-46.0%-61.4%
2026+93.8%-49.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DDD and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, DDD and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DDD and FNGD?

The DDD/FNGD correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.49, 5 years: -0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FNGD a good diversifier for DDD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, DDD and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

A reading of -0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ddd-vs-fngd.json

DDD vs FNGD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35DDD vs FNGD-0.35

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DDD vs FNGD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ddd-vs-fngd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ddd-vs-fngd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DDD correlations · FNGD correlations