PairBook
HomeDBX › DBX vs HTOO

DBX vs HTOO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Dropbox, Inc. (DBX) and Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-724.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DBX and HTOO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DBX and HTOO correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.13) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -724.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, HTOO places #11 of the 18 assets tracked against DBX. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with DBX ahead by 74.7 points (+24.5% versus -50.2%). One caveat on sizing: HTOO is 3.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DBX vs HTOO: side by side

DBX (Dropbox, Inc.)HTOO (Fusion Fuel Green PLC)
1-year return+24.5%-50.2%
5-year return+14.9%-99.5%
Volatility (ann.)32.7%126.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.860.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-37.4%-97.7%
Market cap$7.8B
P/E (trailing)19.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: DBX -37.4% vs -97.7%Higher 5y return: DBX +14.9% vs -99.5%
-50%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DBX · HTOO

Year-by-year returns

YearDBXHTOO
2022-8.8%-46.5%
2023+31.7%-74.7%
2024+1.9%-49.7%
2025-7.5%-83.1%
2026+29.1%-39.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DBX and HTOO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, DBX and HTOO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DBX and HTOO?

The DBX/HTOO correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.13, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HTOO a good diversifier for DBX?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, DBX and HTOO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dbx-vs-htoo.json

DBX vs HTOO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17DBX vs HTOO-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DBX vs HTOO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dbx-vs-htoo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dbx-vs-htoo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DBX correlations · HTOO correlations