PairBook
HomeDBD › DBD vs WMS

DBD vs WMS: Correlation

Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated (DBD) and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
704.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DBD and WMS?

On 3 years of weekly data the DBD/WMS correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.44 over 1 year against 0.49 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 704.9 %².

Within DBD's tracked universe of 12 assets, WMS comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months DBD came out ahead by 11.8 percentage points (+7.4% against -4.4%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DBD vs WMS: side by side

DBD (Diebold Nixdorf Incorporated)WMS (Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.)
1-year return+7.4%-4.4%
5-year returnn/a+22.1%
Volatility (ann.)38.5%37.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.071.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.8%-45.8%
Market cap$2.3B$10.5B
P/E (trailing)22.423.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.52%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: DBD 22.4 vs 23.6Higher yield: WMS 0.52% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: DBD -25.8% vs -45.8%
-12%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. DBD · WMS

Year-by-year returns

YearDBDWMS
2022-39.5%
2023+72.4%
2024+48.7%-17.5%
2025+57.7%+26.0%
2026-0.3%-3.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DBD and WMS good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DBD and WMS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DBD and WMS is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.44 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is WMS a good diversifier for DBD?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.49 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dbd-vs-wms.json

DBD vs WMS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49DBD vs WMS0.49

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![DBD vs WMS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dbd-vs-wms.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dbd-vs-wms/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DBD correlations · WMS correlations