PairBook
HomeCZFS › CZFS vs RBCAA

CZFS vs RBCAA: Correlation

How closely do Citizens Financial Services, Inc. (CZFS) and Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.74, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.74
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.61
long-run
Ann. covariance
900.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CZFS and RBCAA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CZFS and RBCAA correlate at 0.74, strong. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.56 versus 0.74 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.61, with an annualized covariance of 900.5 %².

Few assets follow CZFS as closely as RBCAA, which ranks #3 of 14 tracked partners. The trailing year gives CZFS the advantage: +34.8% versus +25.1%, a 9.7-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: CZFS runs 1.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CZFS vs RBCAA: side by side

CZFS (Citizens Financial Services, Inc.)RBCAA (Republic Bancorp, Inc.)
1-year return+34.8%+25.1%
5-year return+56.8%+117.3%
Volatility (ann.)43.2%28.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.950.68
Max drawdown (3Y)-38.1%-21.6%
Market cap$0.4B$1.8B
P/E (trailing)9.414.4
Dividend yield2.49%2.01%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CZFS 9.4 vs 14.4Higher yield: CZFS 2.49% vs 2.01%Smaller drawdown: RBCAA -21.6% vs -38.1%Higher 5y return: RBCAA +117.3% vs +56.8%
-14%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CZFS · RBCAA

Year-by-year returns

YearCZFSRBCAA
2022+31.2%-16.9%
2023-12.3%+39.4%
2024+2.7%+30.3%
2025-6.9%+1.3%
2026+44.6%+38.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CZFS and RBCAA good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.74 means CZFS and RBCAA share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CZFS and RBCAA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CZFS and RBCAA is 0.74 over 3 years, 0.56 over 1 year and 0.61 over 5 years.

Is RBCAA a good diversifier for CZFS?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.74 means CZFS and RBCAA share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.74 mean?

A reading of 0.74 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/czfs-vs-rbcaa.json

CZFS vs RBCAA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.74CZFS vs RBCAA0.74

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CZFS vs RBCAA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/czfs-vs-rbcaa.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/czfs-vs-rbcaa/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CZFS correlations · RBCAA correlations