CWK vs STC: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cushman & Wakefield Ltd. (CWK) and Stewart Information Services Corporation (STC) carry a correlation of 0.62, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CWK and STC?
On 3 years of weekly data the CWK/STC correlation comes out at 0.62, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.52 over 1 year against 0.62 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.58, and annualized covariance runs at 840.1 %².
By 3-year correlation, STC places #8 of the 26 assets tracked against CWK. The trailing year gives STC the advantage: -11.4% versus -1.5%, a 9.9-point spread. Risk is not evenly split, since CWK carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CWK vs STC: side by side
| CWK (Cushman & Wakefield Ltd.) | STC (Stewart Information Services Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -11.4% | -1.5% |
| 5-year return | -22.4% | +29.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 47.1% | 28.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.67 | 0.74 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -49.0% | -24.7% |
| Market cap | $3.3B | $2.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 50.5 | 15.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CWK | STC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -44.0% | -44.6% |
| 2023 | -13.3% | +43.3% |
| 2024 | +21.1% | +18.2% |
| 2025 | +23.8% | +7.2% |
| 2026 | -12.7% | +1.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CWK and STC good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.62 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CWK and STC?
The CWK/STC correlation stands at 0.62 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.52, 5 years: 0.58), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is STC a good diversifier for CWK?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.62 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.62 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.62 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cwk-vs-stc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cwk-vs-stc/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CWK correlations · STC correlations
