PairBook
HomeCWH › CWH vs RVT

CWH vs RVT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Camping World Holdings, Inc. (CWH) and Royce Small-Cap Trust, Inc. (RVT) carry a correlation of 0.68, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.68
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.60
long-run
Ann. covariance
783.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CWH and RVT?

Over the past 3 years, CWH and RVT moved with a correlation of 0.68, which is strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.59 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.60, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 783.6 %².

Among the 28 assets we track against CWH, RVT ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RVT outperformed by 90.4 percentage points (-63.0% for CWH against +27.4% for RVT). Note the risk asymmetry: CWH runs 3.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CWH vs RVT: side by side

CWH (Camping World Holdings, Inc.)RVT (Royce Small-Cap Trust, Inc.)
1-year return-63.0%+27.4%
5-year return-79.9%+53.9%
Volatility (ann.)60.7%19.1%
Beta vs S&P 5002.020.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.1%-23.5%
Market cap$0.4B$2.3B
P/E (trailing)6.5
Dividend yield3.84%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CWH 3.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RVT -23.5% vs -79.1%Higher 5y return: RVT +53.9% vs -79.9%
-68%0%+26%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CWH · RVT

Year-by-year returns

YearCWHRVT
2022-39.6%-26.3%
2023+25.1%+18.8%
2024-17.9%+17.9%
2025-52.2%+11.5%
2026-33.9%+21.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CWH and RVT good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.68 means CWH and RVT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CWH and RVT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.68 over 3 years, with 0.59 over the last year and 0.60 over 5 years.

Is RVT a good diversifier for CWH?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.68 means CWH and RVT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.68 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cwh-vs-rvt.json

CWH vs RVT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.68CWH vs RVT0.68

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CWH vs RVT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cwh-vs-rvt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cwh-vs-rvt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CWH correlations · RVT correlations