PairBook
HomeCVR › CVR vs FLZH

CVR vs FLZH: Correlation

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR) and Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc. (FLZH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.26
long-run
Ann. covariance
-6641.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CVR and FLZH?

Over the past 3 years, CVR and FLZH moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.46 versus -0.31 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.26, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -6641.0 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against CVR, FLZH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. The last year tells two different stories: CVR led by 100.2 percentage points, +1.0% for CVR against -99.2% for FLZH. Risk is not evenly split, since FLZH carries 8.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CVR vs FLZH: side by side

CVR (Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.)FLZH (Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+1.0%-99.2%
5-year return-56.4%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)50.8%424.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.97-2.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-58.1%-99.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.87%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CVR 0.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CVR -58.1% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: CVR -56.4% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+57%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CVR · FLZH

Year-by-year returns

YearCVRFLZH
2022+12.5%-74.0%
2023-39.0%-48.5%
2024-4.8%-32.5%
2025-11.3%-70.4%
2026-27.2%-98.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CVR and FLZH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CVR and FLZH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.46 over the last year and -0.26 over 5 years.

Is FLZH a good diversifier for CVR?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

A reading of -0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cvr-vs-flzh.json

CVR vs FLZH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31CVR vs FLZH-0.31

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CVR vs FLZH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cvr-vs-flzh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cvr-vs-flzh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CVR correlations · FLZH correlations