CUZ vs RBA: Correlation
Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and RB Global, Inc. (RBA) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.43.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CUZ and RBA?
On 3 years of weekly data the CUZ/RBA correlation comes out at 0.43, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.61) runs above the 3-year figure (0.43). The 5-year figure is 0.34, and annualized covariance runs at 336.0 %².
Among the 19 assets we track against CUZ, RBA ranks #14 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: CUZ led by 32.3 percentage points, +7.0% for CUZ against -25.3% for RBA.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CUZ vs RBA: side by side
| CUZ (Cousins Properties Incorporated) | RBA (RB Global, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +7.0% | -25.3% |
| 5-year return | -3.8% | +48.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.6% | 28.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -29.4% | -30.9% |
| Market cap | $4.9B | $15.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 737.2 | 36.9 |
| Dividend yield | 4.32% | 1.47% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CUZ | RBA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -34.7% | -3.9% |
| 2023 | +2.0% | +20.3% |
| 2024 | +32.6% | +36.8% |
| 2025 | -12.1% | +14.7% |
| 2026 | +18.7% | -15.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CUZ and RBA good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.43, CUZ and RBA keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CUZ and RBA?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CUZ and RBA is 0.43 over 3 years, 0.61 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.
Is RBA a good diversifier for CUZ?
Reasonably. At 0.43, CUZ and RBA keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cuz-vs-rba.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cuz-vs-rba/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CUZ correlations · RBA correlations
