PairBook
HomeCULP › CULP vs LOCL

CULP vs LOCL: Correlation

How closely do Culp, Inc. (CULP) and Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1448.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CULP and LOCL?

On 3 years of weekly data the CULP/LOCL correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.37 versus -0.26 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -1448.2 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against CULP, LOCL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CULP outperformed by 40.9 percentage points (-17.9% for CULP against -58.8% for LOCL). One caveat on sizing: LOCL is 3.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CULP vs LOCL: side by side

CULP (Culp, Inc.)LOCL (Local Bounti Corporation)
1-year return-17.9%-58.8%
5-year return-73.3%-99.2%
Volatility (ann.)39.5%142.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.60-0.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-58.6%-79.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CULP -58.6% vs -79.4%Higher 5y return: CULP -73.3% vs -99.2%
-57%0%+50%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CULP · LOCL

Year-by-year returns

YearCULPLOCL
2022-50.4%-78.4%
2023+26.1%-88.5%
2024+1.4%+0.0%
2025-39.4%+3.4%
2026-3.8%-53.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CULP and LOCL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CULP and LOCL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CULP and LOCL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CULP and LOCL is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.37 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is LOCL a good diversifier for CULP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CULP and LOCL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/culp-vs-locl.json

CULP vs LOCL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26CULP vs LOCL-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CULP vs LOCL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/culp-vs-locl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/culp-vs-locl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CULP correlations · LOCL correlations