PairBook
HomeCUE › CUE vs SCI

CUE vs SCI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cue Biopharma, Inc. (CUE) and Service Corporation International (SCI) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-765.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CUE and SCI?

On 3 years of weekly data the CUE/SCI correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.36 versus -0.21 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.06, and annualized covariance runs at -765.2 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against CUE, SCI lands near the bottom at #12. On 12-month performance CUE holds a 7.1-point edge, +13.6% against +6.5%. One caveat on sizing: CUE is 6.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CUE vs SCI: side by side

CUE (Cue Biopharma, Inc.)SCI (Service Corporation International)
1-year return+13.6%+6.5%
5-year return-92.2%+44.7%
Volatility (ann.)155.6%23.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.740.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.3%-21.6%
Market cap$0.2B$11.4B
P/E (trailing)21.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.59%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: SCI 1.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SCI -21.6% vs -94.3%Higher 5y return: SCI +44.7% vs -92.2%
-77%0%+57%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CUE · SCI

Year-by-year returns

YearCUESCI
2022-74.8%-1.0%
2023-7.4%+0.7%
2024-58.7%+18.4%
2025-72.0%-0.7%
2026+207.8%+8.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CUE and SCI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CUE and SCI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is SCI a good diversifier for CUE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cue-vs-sci.json

CUE vs SCI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21CUE vs SCI-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CUE vs SCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cue-vs-sci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cue-vs-sci/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CUE correlations · SCI correlations