PairBook
HomeCUE › CUE vs HSIC

CUE vs HSIC: Correlation

Cue Biopharma, Inc. (CUE) and Henry Schein (HSIC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-652.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CUE and HSIC?

On 3 years of weekly data the CUE/HSIC correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.14 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.05, and annualized covariance runs at -652.6 %².

HSIC is close to the least connected end of CUE's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 15. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HSIC outperformed by 17.3 percentage points (+13.6% for CUE against +30.9% for HSIC). Note the risk asymmetry: CUE runs 6.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CUE vs HSIC: side by side

CUE (Cue Biopharma, Inc.)HSIC (Henry Schein)
1-year return+13.6%+30.9%
5-year return-92.2%+20.1%
Volatility (ann.)155.6%25.2%
Beta vs S&P 5002.740.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-94.3%-24.3%
Market cap$0.2B$10.1B
P/E (trailing)26.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Smaller drawdown: HSIC -24.3% vs -94.3%Higher 5y return: HSIC +20.1% vs -92.2%
-77%0%+57%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CUE · HSIC

Year-by-year returns

YearCUEHSIC
2022-74.8%+3.0%
2023-7.4%-5.2%
2024-58.7%-8.6%
2025-72.0%+9.2%
2026+207.8%+19.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CUE and HSIC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, CUE and HSIC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CUE and HSIC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CUE and HSIC is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.14 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is HSIC a good diversifier for CUE?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, CUE and HSIC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cue-vs-hsic.json

CUE vs HSIC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17CUE vs HSIC-0.17

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CUE vs HSIC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cue-vs-hsic.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cue-vs-hsic/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CUE correlations · HSIC correlations