PairBook
HomeCTVA › CTVA vs MBAI

CTVA vs MBAI: Correlation

How closely do Corteva (CTVA) and Check-Cap Ltd. (MBAI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2505.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTVA and MBAI?

On 3 years of weekly data the CTVA/MBAI correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.20). The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -2505.5 %².

Within CTVA's tracked universe of 34 assets, MBAI comes in at #28 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MBAI led by 899.9 percentage points, +10.9% for CTVA against +910.8% for MBAI. One caveat on sizing: MBAI is 17.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTVA vs MBAI: side by side

CTVA (Corteva)MBAI (Check-Cap Ltd.)
1-year return+10.9%+910.8%
5-year return+98.2%-69.3%
Volatility (ann.)26.8%474.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.431.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.7%-87.3%
Market cap$55.0B
P/E (trailing)50.21.4
Dividend yield0.87%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: MBAI 1.4 vs 50.2Higher yield: CTVA 0.87% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CTVA -20.7% vs -87.3%Higher 5y return: CTVA +98.2% vs -69.3%
-15%0%+1202%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CTVA · MBAI

Year-by-year returns

YearCTVAMBAI
2022+25.6%-83.7%
2023-17.5%-5.5%
2024+20.2%-52.4%
2025+18.9%+63.6%
2026+23.5%+305.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTVA and MBAI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CTVA and MBAI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTVA and MBAI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.40 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is MBAI a good diversifier for CTVA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CTVA and MBAI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctva-vs-mbai.json

CTVA vs MBAI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CTVA vs MBAI-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CTVA vs MBAI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctva-vs-mbai.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctva-vs-mbai/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTVA correlations · MBAI correlations