PairBook
HomeCTSH › CTSH vs MO

CTSH vs MO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cognizant (CTSH) and Altria (MO) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-142.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTSH and MO?

Over the past 3 years, CTSH and MO moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.47) than the 3-year average (-0.20). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.02, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -142.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, MO places #38 of the 44 assets tracked against CTSH. The last year tells two different stories: MO led by 18.6 percentage points, -9.8% for CTSH against +8.8% for MO. The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between -0.47 and 0.40 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTSH vs MO: side by side

CTSH (Cognizant)MO (Altria)
1-year return-9.8%+8.8%
5-year return-9.6%+100.4%
Volatility (ann.)32.3%21.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.89-0.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.1%-16.4%
Market cap$28.7B$113.0B
P/E (trailing)13.314.6
Dividend yield2.09%6.13%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: CTSH 13.3 vs 14.6Higher yield: MO 6.13% vs 2.09%Smaller drawdown: MO -16.4% vs -56.1%Higher 5y return: MO +100.4% vs -9.6%
-43%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CTSH · MO

Year-by-year returns

YearCTSHMO
2022-34.5%+4.4%
2023+34.4%-3.7%
2024+3.5%+40.8%
2025+9.7%+18.2%
2026-21.8%+21.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTSH and MO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTSH and MO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTSH and MO is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.47 over 1 year and -0.02 over 5 years.

Is MO a good diversifier for CTSH?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctsh-vs-mo.json

CTSH vs MO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CTSH vs MO-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CTSH vs MO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctsh-vs-mo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctsh-vs-mo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTSH correlations · MO correlations