PairBook
HomeCTSH › CTSH vs ICCM

CTSH vs ICCM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cognizant (CTSH) and IceCure Medical Ltd. (ICCM) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-724.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTSH and ICCM?

On 3 years of weekly data the CTSH/ICCM correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.28 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.10, and annualized covariance runs at -724.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, ICCM places #36 of the 44 assets tracked against CTSH. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CTSH outperformed by 82.5 percentage points (-9.8% for CTSH against -92.3% for ICCM). One caveat on sizing: ICCM is 3.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTSH vs ICCM: side by side

CTSH (Cognizant)ICCM (IceCure Medical Ltd.)
1-year return-9.8%-92.3%
5-year return-9.6%-99.3%
Volatility (ann.)32.3%117.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.890.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.1%-95.4%
Market cap$28.7B
P/E (trailing)13.3
Dividend yield2.09%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Higher yield: CTSH 2.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CTSH -56.1% vs -95.4%Higher 5y return: CTSH -9.6% vs -99.3%
-93%0%+20%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CTSH · ICCM

Year-by-year returns

YearCTSHICCM
2022-34.5%-49.2%
2023+34.4%-31.0%
2024+3.5%+2.8%
2025+9.7%-44.5%
2026-21.8%-87.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTSH and ICCM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTSH and ICCM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.28 over the last year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is ICCM a good diversifier for CTSH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctsh-vs-iccm.json

CTSH vs ICCM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19CTSH vs ICCM-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CTSH vs ICCM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctsh-vs-iccm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctsh-vs-iccm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTSH correlations · ICCM correlations