PairBook
HomeCTS › CTS vs VXZ

CTS vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do CTS Corporation (CTS) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.57, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.57
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.47
long-run
Ann. covariance
-484.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTS and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, CTS and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.57, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.30) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.57). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.47, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -484.3 %².

Among the 26 assets we track against CTS, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #25. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CTS ahead by 51.9 points (+35.8% versus -16.1%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTS vs VXZ: side by side

CTS (CTS Corporation)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+35.8%-16.1%
5-year return+63.4%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)33.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.40-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.6%-36.4%
Market cap$1.6B
P/E (trailing)23.8
Dividend yield0.28%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -40.6%Higher 5y return: CTS +63.4% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+59%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CTS · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCTSVXZ
2022+7.8%+0.5%
2023+11.4%-44.0%
2024+20.9%-12.7%
2025-18.4%+5.7%
2026+34.7%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTS and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.57, CTS and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTS and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTS and VXZ is -0.57 over 3 years, -0.30 over 1 year and -0.47 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CTS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.57, CTS and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.57 mean?

A reading of -0.57 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cts-vs-vxz.json

CTS vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.57CTS vs VXZ-0.57

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CTS vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cts-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cts-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTS correlations · VXZ correlations