PairBook
HomeCTRM › CTRM vs ECHO

CTRM vs ECHO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Castor Maritime Inc. (CTRM) and EchoStar (ECHO) carry a correlation of -0.15, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-708.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTRM and ECHO?

On 3 years of weekly data the CTRM/ECHO correlation comes out at -0.15, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.13) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.02, and annualized covariance runs at -708.9 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against CTRM, ECHO lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ECHO outperformed by 35.1 percentage points (+12.1% for CTRM against +47.2% for ECHO). One caveat on sizing: ECHO is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTRM vs ECHO: side by side

CTRM (Castor Maritime Inc.)ECHO (EchoStar)
1-year return+12.1%+47.2%
5-year return-89.2%+227.3%
Volatility (ann.)51.7%91.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.351.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-72.3%-50.1%
Market cap$25.1B
P/E (trailing)0.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Smaller drawdown: ECHO -50.1% vs -72.3%Higher 5y return: ECHO +227.3% vs -89.2%
-12%0%+104%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CTRM · ECHO

Year-by-year returns

YearCTRMECHO
2022-21.1%-36.7%
2023-62.1%-0.7%
2024-35.3%+38.2%
2025-24.7%+374.7%
2026+15.9%-20.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTRM and ECHO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.15, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTRM and ECHO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTRM and ECHO is -0.15 over 3 years, -0.13 over 1 year and 0.02 over 5 years.

Is ECHO a good diversifier for CTRM?

Yes: at -0.15, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

A reading of -0.15 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctrm-vs-echo.json

CTRM vs ECHO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15CTRM vs ECHO-0.15

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CTRM vs ECHO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctrm-vs-echo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctrm-vs-echo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTRM correlations · ECHO correlations