PairBook
HomeCTNT › CTNT vs SRG

CTNT vs SRG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc. (CTNT) and Seritage Growth Properties (SRG) carry a correlation of -0.39, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.39
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-7698.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTNT and SRG?

Over the past 3 years, CTNT and SRG moved with a correlation of -0.39, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.04) than the 3-year average (-0.39). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -7698.0 %².

Among the 21 assets we track against CTNT, SRG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #21. The last year tells two different stories: SRG led by 56.7 percentage points, -99.6% for CTNT against -42.9% for SRG. Risk is not evenly split, since CTNT carries 10.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTNT vs SRG: side by side

CTNT (Cheetah Net Supply Chain Service Inc.)SRG (Seritage Growth Properties)
1-year return-99.6%-42.9%
5-year returnn/a-86.6%
Volatility (ann.)461.2%42.5%
Beta vs S&P 5002.820.81
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-79.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: SRG -79.0% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+16%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CTNT · SRG

Year-by-year returns

YearCTNTSRG
2022-10.9%
2023-21.0%
2024-85.3%-55.9%
2025-61.4%-21.1%
2026-99.4%-36.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTNT and SRG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.39, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTNT and SRG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTNT and SRG is -0.39 over 3 years, 0.04 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is SRG a good diversifier for CTNT?

Yes: at -0.39, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?

A reading of -0.39 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctnt-vs-srg.json

CTNT vs SRG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.39CTNT vs SRG-0.39

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CTNT vs SRG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctnt-vs-srg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctnt-vs-srg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTNT correlations · SRG correlations