PairBook
HomeCSGP › CSGP vs ZG

CSGP vs ZG: Correlation

How closely do CoStar Group (CSGP) and Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.44, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
759.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CSGP and ZG?

On 3 years of weekly data the CSGP/ZG correlation comes out at 0.44, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.62) than the 3-year average (0.44). The 5-year figure is 0.43, and annualized covariance runs at 759.6 %².

Among the 34 assets we track against CSGP, ZG ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives ZG the advantage: -65.0% versus -55.5%, a 9.5-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CSGP vs ZG: side by side

CSGP (CoStar Group)ZG (Zillow Group, Inc.)
1-year return-65.0%-55.5%
5-year return-62.7%-62.1%
Volatility (ann.)36.5%46.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.861.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-72.2%-66.4%
Market cap$12.7B$8.2B
P/E (trailing)174.1158.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryReal EstateUS Listed
Lower P/E: ZG 158.0 vs 174.1Smaller drawdown: ZG -66.4% vs -72.2%Higher 5y return: ZG -62.1% vs -62.7%
-69%0%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CSGP · ZG

Year-by-year returns

YearCSGPZG
2022-2.2%-49.8%
2023+13.1%+81.7%
2024-18.1%+24.9%
2025-6.1%-3.7%
2026-53.4%-46.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CSGP and ZG good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.44, CSGP and ZG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CSGP and ZG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.44 over 3 years, with 0.62 over the last year and 0.43 over 5 years.

Is ZG a good diversifier for CSGP?

Reasonably. At 0.44, CSGP and ZG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.44 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/csgp-vs-zg.json

CSGP vs ZG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44CSGP vs ZG0.44

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CSGP vs ZG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/csgp-vs-zg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/csgp-vs-zg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CSGP correlations · ZG correlations