PairBook
HomeCSCO › CSCO vs WFCF

CSCO vs WFCF: Correlation

How closely do Cisco (CSCO) and Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-330.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CSCO and WFCF?

On 3 years of weekly data the CSCO/WFCF correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.34) than the 3-year average (-0.22). The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -330.3 %².

Within CSCO's tracked universe of 30 assets, WFCF comes in at #25 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: CSCO led by 56.9 percentage points, +67.3% for CSCO against +10.4% for WFCF. Risk is not evenly split, since WFCF carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CSCO vs WFCF: side by side

CSCO (Cisco)WFCF (Where Food Comes From, Inc.)
1-year return+67.3%+10.4%
5-year return+118.1%+0.4%
Volatility (ann.)26.4%57.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.840.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.2%-49.1%
Market cap$442.0B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)33.845.7
Dividend yield1.48%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Lower P/E: CSCO 33.8 vs 45.7Higher yield: CSCO 1.48% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CSCO -20.2% vs -49.1%Higher 5y return: CSCO +118.1% vs +0.4%
-25%0%+85%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CSCO · WFCF

Year-by-year returns

YearCSCOWFCF
2022-22.5%-3.7%
2023+9.3%-3.0%
2024+21.0%-2.3%
2025+33.5%-13.2%
2026+47.7%+15.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CSCO and WFCF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CSCO and WFCF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CSCO and WFCF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CSCO and WFCF is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.34 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is WFCF a good diversifier for CSCO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CSCO and WFCF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/csco-vs-wfcf.json

CSCO vs WFCF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CSCO vs WFCF-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CSCO vs WFCF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/csco-vs-wfcf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/csco-vs-wfcf/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CSCO correlations · WFCF correlations