PairBook
HomeCRMT › CRMT vs RFL

CRMT vs RFL: Correlation

How closely do America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) and Rafael Holdings, Inc. (RFL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-937.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CRMT and RFL?

Over the past 3 years, CRMT and RFL moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.46 versus -0.20 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -937.7 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against CRMT, RFL ranks #8 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RFL outperformed by 153.1 percentage points (-95.1% for CRMT against +58.0% for RFL).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CRMT vs RFL: side by side

CRMT (America's Car-Mart, Inc.)RFL (Rafael Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-95.1%+58.0%
5-year return-98.2%-94.5%
Volatility (ann.)78.3%61.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.850.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.2%-59.3%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RFL -59.3% vs -98.2%Higher 5y return: RFL -94.5% vs -98.2%
-94%0%+119%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CRMT · RFL

Year-by-year returns

YearCRMTRFL
2022-29.4%-63.3%
2023+4.9%-2.1%
2024-32.4%-9.8%
2025-50.7%-27.5%
2026-90.9%+100.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CRMT and RFL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CRMT and RFL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CRMT and RFL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CRMT and RFL is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.46 over 1 year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is RFL a good diversifier for CRMT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CRMT and RFL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crmt-vs-rfl.json

CRMT vs RFL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CRMT vs RFL-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CRMT vs RFL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/crmt-vs-rfl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crmt-vs-rfl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CRMT correlations · RFL correlations