PairBook
HomeCRML › CRML vs PBA

CRML vs PBA: Correlation

How closely do Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) and Pembina Pipeline Corp. (PBA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-672.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CRML and PBA?

Over the past 3 years, CRML and PBA moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.39) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.16, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -672.1 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against CRML, PBA sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. On 12-month performance PBA holds a 7.9-point edge, +23.5% against +31.4%. Note the risk asymmetry: CRML runs 7.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CRML vs PBA: side by side

CRML (Critical Metals Corp.)PBA (Pembina Pipeline Corp.)
1-year return+23.5%+31.4%
5-year return-19.1%+98.2%
Volatility (ann.)144.4%20.0%
Beta vs S&P 5002.110.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.9%-17.9%
Market cap$1.2B$28.1B
P/E (trailing)23.7
Dividend yield0.00%5.93%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PBA 5.93% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PBA -17.9% vs -93.9%Higher 5y return: PBA +98.2% vs -19.1%
-6%0%+259%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CRML · PBA

Year-by-year returns

YearCRMLPBA
2022+18.3%
2023+7.7%+7.8%
2024-38.3%+13.2%
2025+2.2%+5.7%
2026+15.9%+30.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CRML and PBA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, CRML and PBA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CRML and PBA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CRML and PBA is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.39 over 1 year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is PBA a good diversifier for CRML?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, CRML and PBA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crml-vs-pba.json

CRML vs PBA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CRML vs PBA-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CRML vs PBA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/crml-vs-pba.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crml-vs-pba/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CRML correlations · PBA correlations