PairBook
HomeCRC › CRC vs FTK

CRC vs FTK: Correlation

California Resources Corporation (CRC) and Flotek Industries, Inc. (FTK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.44.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.17
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.31
long-run
Ann. covariance
1296.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CRC and FTK?

Over the past 3 years, CRC and FTK moved with a correlation of 0.44, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.17) runs below the 3-year figure (0.44). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.31, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1296.1 %².

Within CRC's tracked universe of 13 assets, FTK comes in at #6 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FTK ahead by 91.7 points (+8.5% versus +100.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: FTK runs 2.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CRC vs FTK: side by side

CRC (California Resources Corporation)FTK (Flotek Industries, Inc.)
1-year return+8.5%+100.2%
5-year return+78.6%+196.8%
Volatility (ann.)34.5%84.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.591.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.8%-49.6%
Market cap$4.7B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)24.2
Dividend yield3.05%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CRC 3.05% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CRC -44.8% vs -49.6%Higher 5y return: FTK +196.8% vs +78.6%
-10%0%+218%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CRC · FTK

Year-by-year returns

YearCRCFTK
2022+3.7%-0.9%
2023+28.9%-41.7%
2024-2.6%+143.1%
2025-10.8%+80.8%
2026+20.0%+41.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CRC and FTK good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.44, CRC and FTK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CRC and FTK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CRC and FTK is 0.44 over 3 years, 0.17 over 1 year and 0.31 over 5 years.

Is FTK a good diversifier for CRC?

Reasonably. At 0.44, CRC and FTK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

A reading of 0.44 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crc-vs-ftk.json

CRC vs FTK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44CRC vs FTK0.44

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CRC vs FTK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/crc-vs-ftk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crc-vs-ftk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CRC correlations · FTK correlations