PairBook
HomeCPZ › CPZ vs VXZ

CPZ vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust - Closed (CPZ) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.39, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.39
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.58
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
-113.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CPZ and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the CPZ/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.39, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.58) than the 3-year average (-0.39). The 5-year figure is -0.43, and annualized covariance runs at -113.3 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of CPZ's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 10. On 12-month performance CPZ holds a 6.9-point edge, -9.2% against -16.1%. Note the risk asymmetry: VXZ runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CPZ vs VXZ: side by side

CPZ (Calamos Long/Short Equity & Dynamic Income Trust - Closed)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-9.2%-16.1%
5-year return+14.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)11.3%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.30-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.9%-36.4%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)63.7
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CPZ -17.9% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: CPZ +14.8% vs -53.1%
-17%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CPZ · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCPZVXZ
2022-14.0%+0.5%
2023+6.3%-44.0%
2024+16.0%-12.7%
2025+9.8%+5.7%
2026-1.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CPZ and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CPZ and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CPZ and VXZ is -0.39 over 3 years, -0.58 over 1 year and -0.43 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CPZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cpz-vs-vxz.json

CPZ vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.39CPZ vs VXZ-0.39

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CPZ vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cpz-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cpz-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CPZ correlations · VXZ correlations