PairBook
HomeCPBI › CPBI vs MMA

CPBI vs MMA: Correlation

How closely do Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. (CPBI) and Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited (MMA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.33, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-675.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CPBI and MMA?

On 3 years of weekly data the CPBI/MMA correlation comes out at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.36 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -675.8 %².

Out of 11 assets tracked against CPBI, MMA lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: CPBI led by 86.6 percentage points, +35.0% for CPBI against -51.6% for MMA. Note the risk asymmetry: MMA runs 8.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CPBI vs MMA: side by side

CPBI (Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.)MMA (Mixed Martial Arts Group Limited)
1-year return+35.0%-51.6%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)15.5%134.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.162.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-8.4%-92.2%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)17.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CPBI -8.4% vs -92.2%
-53%0%+104%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CPBI · MMA

Year-by-year returns

YearCPBIMMA
2024+46.7%
2025+13.1%-20.6%
2026+23.7%-58.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CPBI and MMA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, CPBI and MMA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CPBI and MMA?

The CPBI/MMA correlation stands at -0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.36, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MMA a good diversifier for CPBI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, CPBI and MMA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cpbi-vs-mma.json

CPBI vs MMA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33CPBI vs MMA-0.33

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CPBI vs MMA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cpbi-vs-mma.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cpbi-vs-mma/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CPBI correlations · MMA correlations