PairBook
HomeCOST › COST vs SUNE

COST vs SUNE: Correlation

How closely do Costco (COST) and SUNation Energy, Inc. (SUNE) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-801.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are COST and SUNE?

On 3 years of weekly data the COST/SUNE correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.07) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.21). The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -801.8 %².

Among the 33 assets we track against COST, SUNE ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: SUNE led by 47.7 percentage points, -1.0% for COST against +46.7% for SUNE. Risk is not evenly split, since SUNE carries 9.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

COST vs SUNE: side by side

COST (Costco)SUNE (SUNation Energy, Inc.)
1-year return-1.0%+46.7%
5-year return+116.3%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)19.8%189.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.45-0.81
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.7%-100.0%
Market cap$414.5B
P/E (trailing)48.11.1
Dividend yield0.56%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Lower P/E: SUNE 1.1 vs 48.1Higher yield: COST 0.56% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: COST -20.7% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: COST +116.3% vs -100.0%
-35%0%+162%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. COST · SUNE

Year-by-year returns

YearCOSTSUNE
2022-19.0%-75.7%
2023+49.0%-74.7%
2024+39.6%-99.4%
2025-5.4%-99.8%
2026+8.9%+113.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are COST and SUNE good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between COST and SUNE?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between COST and SUNE is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.07 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is SUNE a good diversifier for COST?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cost-vs-sune.json

COST vs SUNE: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21COST vs SUNE-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![COST vs SUNE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cost-vs-sune.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cost-vs-sune/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: COST correlations · SUNE correlations