PairBook
HomeCOST › COST vs SSP

COST vs SSP: Correlation

How closely do Costco (COST) and E.W. Scripps Company (The) (SSP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-531.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are COST and SSP?

Over the past 3 years, COST and SSP moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.18 over 1 year against -0.25 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -531.9 %².

Out of 33 assets tracked against COST, SSP lands near the bottom at #31. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SSP outperformed by 38.3 percentage points (-1.0% for COST against +37.3% for SSP). Risk is not evenly split, since SSP carries 5.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

COST vs SSP: side by side

COST (Costco)SSP (E.W. Scripps Company (The))
1-year return-1.0%+37.3%
5-year return+116.3%-77.0%
Volatility (ann.)19.8%107.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.450.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.7%-84.5%
Market cap$414.5B$0.3B
P/E (trailing)48.1
Dividend yield0.56%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: COST 0.56% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: COST -20.7% vs -84.5%Higher 5y return: COST +116.3% vs -77.0%
-26%0%+124%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). COST · SSP

Year-by-year returns

YearCOSTSSP
2022-19.0%-31.8%
2023+49.0%-39.4%
2024+39.6%-72.3%
2025-5.4%+140.1%
2026+8.9%-20.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are COST and SSP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between COST and SSP?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between COST and SSP is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.18 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is SSP a good diversifier for COST?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cost-vs-ssp.json

COST vs SSP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25COST vs SSP-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![COST vs SSP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cost-vs-ssp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cost-vs-ssp/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: COST correlations · SSP correlations