PairBook
HomeCOKE › COKE vs FLD

COKE vs FLD: Correlation

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) and Fold Holdings, Inc. (FLD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-639.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are COKE and FLD?

Over the past 3 years, COKE and FLD moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.26 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.18, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -639.2 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against COKE, FLD lands near the bottom at #9. The last year tells two different stories: COKE led by 150.4 percentage points, +66.8% for COKE against -83.6% for FLD. Risk is not evenly split, since FLD carries 2.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

COKE vs FLD: side by side

COKE (Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.)FLD (Fold Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+66.8%-83.6%
5-year return+408.3%-93.7%
Volatility (ann.)34.3%78.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.280.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.4%-96.7%
Market cap$13.0B
P/E (trailing)25.8
Dividend yield0.52%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: COKE 0.52% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: COKE -27.4% vs -96.7%Higher 5y return: COKE +408.3% vs -93.7%
-88%0%+80%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. COKE · FLD

Year-by-year returns

YearCOKEFLD
2022-17.1%
2023+82.9%+5.3%
2024+38.7%+5.2%
2025+22.6%-76.5%
2026+27.5%-76.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are COKE and FLD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between COKE and FLD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between COKE and FLD is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.26 over 1 year and -0.18 over 5 years.

Is FLD a good diversifier for COKE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/coke-vs-fld.json

COKE vs FLD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24COKE vs FLD-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![COKE vs FLD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/coke-vs-fld.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/coke-vs-fld/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: COKE correlations · FLD correlations