PairBook
HomeCOGT › COGT vs TULP

COGT vs TULP: Correlation

How closely do Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1242.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are COGT and TULP?

On 3 years of weekly data the COGT/TULP correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.31) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -1242.0 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against COGT, TULP lands near the bottom at #12. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with COGT ahead by 240.2 points (+199.8% versus -40.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: COGT runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

COGT vs TULP: side by side

COGT (Cogent Biosciences, Inc.)TULP (Bloomia Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+199.8%-40.4%
5-year return+355.1%-59.8%
Volatility (ann.)106.0%52.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.780.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-69.0%-53.2%
Market cap$6.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TULP -53.2% vs -69.0%Higher 5y return: COGT +355.1% vs -59.8%
-43%0%+225%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. COGT · TULP

Year-by-year returns

YearCOGTTULP
2022+34.7%-66.2%
2023-49.1%-41.0%
2024+32.7%+5.2%
2025+355.4%-28.9%
2026+4.4%-1.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are COGT and TULP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between COGT and TULP?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.31 over the last year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is TULP a good diversifier for COGT?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cogt-vs-tulp.json

COGT vs TULP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22COGT vs TULP-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![COGT vs TULP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cogt-vs-tulp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cogt-vs-tulp/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: COGT correlations · TULP correlations