PairBook
HomeCNTY › CNTY vs EMR

CNTY vs EMR: Correlation

Century Casinos, Inc. (CNTY) and Emerson Electric (EMR) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.48.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.49
long-run
Ann. covariance
786.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CNTY and EMR?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CNTY and EMR correlate at 0.48, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.46 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.49, with an annualized covariance of 786.4 %².

EMR is one of the assets that tracks CNTY most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 10 assets we track against CNTY. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with EMR ahead by 74.4 points (-54.4% versus +20.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since CNTY carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CNTY vs EMR: side by side

CNTY (Century Casinos, Inc.)EMR (Emerson Electric)
1-year return-54.4%+20.0%
5-year return-90.7%+65.4%
Volatility (ann.)57.5%28.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.201.29
Max drawdown (3Y)-82.3%-29.6%
Market cap$88.0B
P/E (trailing)34.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.39%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: EMR 1.39% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: EMR -29.6% vs -82.3%Higher 5y return: EMR +65.4% vs -90.7%
-58%0%+25%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CNTY · EMR

Year-by-year returns

YearCNTYEMR
2022-42.3%+5.7%
2023-30.6%+3.8%
2024-33.6%+29.7%
2025-59.0%+8.9%
2026-7.5%+20.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CNTY and EMR good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CNTY and EMR?

The CNTY/EMR correlation stands at 0.48 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.46, 5 years: 0.49), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is EMR a good diversifier for CNTY?

A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.48 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cnty-vs-emr.json

CNTY vs EMR: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48CNTY vs EMR0.48

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CNTY vs EMR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cnty-vs-emr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cnty-vs-emr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CNTY correlations · EMR correlations